Friday, February 20, 2015

Blog 5

Social construction was represented throughout most of the entire Radio Lab podcast about football.  The podcast started out talking about some of the early days of football and then went more in depth about it when the Indian school named Carlisle started to play football against some of the Ivy League schools such as Harvard.  The schools founder, Richard Pratt, originally was a little opposed to the Indian kids playing such a violent sport such as football because he didn’t want people to look at them and start stereotyping them further as savages or overly aggressive.  Eventually Pratt let in and allowed football to be played at the school if they followed some rules. “Never slug, people looking on will say ‘that’s the Indian in them. Just see them, they’re savages.”-Pratt. 

During one game against either Yale or Harvard the referee at the game called a bad call against Carlisle.  The stands from the Ivy League school were upset because everyone there knew it was a poor call and it was deliberately meant to hurt Carlisle in the game.  The reason the referee called such a bad was because he did not want a school like Carlisle to defeat one of the leading academic schools in the nation, which also happened to be one of the best football teams.  Along with that reason it would have looked negative to have “civilized” students be defeated by a group of students from another school that were looked on as negative at the time. 

An example of social construction I saw reading the Lorber text was when the person on the subway saw a young child wearing blue clothes and the father put a Yankee hat on the head of the child.  The person on the subway assumed this was a young little boy until he noticed the shoes had some flowers and also the young child had pierced ears.  That is when he pieced it together and realized that the young child was indeed a little girl.  The subway rider assumed because of the colors of the clothes and the baseball hat that the child must be a boy but then the rider was proven wrong.  At that point the subway rider could have thrown out a lot of assumptions he made of the child once he realized he got the child’s sex incorrect. “You couldn't tell if it was a boy or a girl. The child in the stroller was wearing a dark blue T-shirt and dark print pants. As they started to leave the train, the father put a Yankee baseball cap 011 the child's head. Ah, a boy, I thought. Then I noticed the gleam of tiny earrings in the child's ears, and as they got off, I saw the little flowered sneakers and lace-trimmed socks. Not a boy after all. Gender done.”


I am not too sure about my thoughts on social construction because I tend to look at things with an attitude like “that’s the way things are because that’s the way they are.”  I always have gone with the flow in life because I guess I have always been part of the groups of people that tend be on the more privileged side of life.  At home things have always been fairly traditional.  My brother and I always worked outside on the property with things such as landscaping or doing other manual labor that needed to be done.  On the flip-side my sister tends to work a lot inside with our mother on things such as dishes, food preparation, and other basic cleaning around the house.  I would say we all got thrown into those jobs because of our sex.  My brother and I are of course guys and we are both the stereotypical manly men that you would think of.  That may be because we were brought up to be that way because that is what is deemed to be normal where we are from.  My sister is the stereotypical teenaged girl.  She likes to cook food and keep things clean and organized.  This is probably because she was brought up to believe that is just the way things need to be done.  In today’s world you could easily flip the gender roles for working around the house.  Women could do a lot of the work that is done outdoors and men of course could cook and clean the inside.  Maybe in more progressive places like larger cities on the coasts there are cases that they do but that is not simply the case in western Nebraska where I am from.  It is pretty traditional there and not a whole lot has changed with social construction there.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Andrew,

    Your post was very interesting! I enjoyed what you said about the football radio cast! I listened to that one too, but I pulled something different out of it. It's cool to see the different things people can get from the same thing. I also enjoyed how you put that maybe social construction differs depending on where you grew up or where you live now. Your story about your home life really showed me what you think about social construction and how it fits into your family life. What do you think about switching jobs outside of the home? Do you think it would still be easy or harder to do? I really enjoyed your post!
    -Nicole Carver

    ReplyDelete
  2. Andrew,
    I enjoyed reading your post and I am glad you picked the football topic! I am also glad you used the subway topic. Do you think that it ever came to Lorber's mind that maybe the father was a devoted Yankees fan and just wants his daughter to become one too? I personally believe you don't have to wear specific clothes to show whether you are male or female. What is your opinion on this subject? I also agree about the "social norms" of the men doing the more physically demanding work and women doing the more articulate type of projects but I am open to both doing the opposites work. What is your opinion on this?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed your blog, I liked your example of the bad call during the Carlisle, Yale game, I also listened to that podcast and used it in my blog. do you think that the Carlisle school's football team had any permanent effects on how white people viewed American Indians?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Andrew,

    I thought you did an excellent job touching on some of the key points in each article you read. I liked how you discussed that you accept “that’s the way things are because that’s the way they are.” It is true that we live in an area where it would be abnormal to see a women doing physical labor outside. Do you think they should do strenuous work-- or are things okay the way they are? Is it okay when a man chooses to cook and clean around the house? Lastly, are men able to do "womenly" things easier than women are able to do "manly" things.

    ReplyDelete
  5. One of the things you brought up was how Richard Pratt had the foresight to think about the dangers of football and how it could reflect badly on American Indian's. I think this is an important point, as it shows that people can attempt to prevent the construction of certain social norms before they are already set in place.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Andrew!

    Great post, I enjoyed your interpretation of the texts!

    My only question for you is about this statement you made, "I tend to look at things with an attitude like “that’s the way things are because that’s the way they are.” I always have gone with the flow in life because I guess I have always been part of the groups of people that tend be on the more privileged side of life." Do you still feel as this attitude is the way to go? Has it changed at all after your readings?

    ReplyDelete